
MIL Tries To Shame Pregnant DIL For “Neglecting” Toddler, Ends Up Getting Schooled By Her Own Son
Interview With ExpertMothers-in-law get a bad rap, but sometimes they deserve it. Whether they’re telling you how to parent your kids or offering other unsolicited advice because they know best, they have a habit of sticking their nose in where it’s not always wanted.
One woman was reduced to tears after her mother-in-law texted her husband to tell him she thought his wife was a neglectful mom. She turned to netizens to share her side of the story and get their opinions on the matter.
More info: Mumsnet
Mothers-in-law can be an overbearing handful, as this woman found out the hard way
Image credits: cottonbro studio / Pexels (not the actual photo)
Heavily pregnant and mother to a toddler, she takes a quick bath when her sciatica becomes too much to bear
Image credits: lucas mendes / Pexels (not the actual photo)
When she takes these baths, she lets her toddler play alone, but only in part of the house and always within earshot
Image credits: Yan Krukau / Pexels (not the actual photo)
When her mother-in-law found out about this, she texted the woman’s husband to claim she was being neglectful
Image credits: dil8
The husband sprang to his wife’s defense, but she’s still wondering if leaving her kid semi-supervised while taking a bath from time to time makes her an awful parent
Being pregnant is hard enough, but throw in intense back pain and a toddler, and it’s a full-time endurance test. OP, dealing with sciatica and symphysis pubis dysfunction (SPD), found half an hour of relief by soaking in the bath while her 2-year-old daughter played nearby. Everything was baby-proofed, doors bolted, and cartoons queued up.
The bathroom is within earshot of OP’s daughter’s play areas, with safety locks on cupboards and meds locked away in a tall cabinet. The kid moves freely between the living room, her bedroom, and occasionally joins OP to play with bath toys. It’s their version of supervised independence; short, calm, and safe.
However, when the OP’s mother-in-law found out about the midday bath breaks, she accused her of being “neglectful.” Apparently, anything could happen in those 30 minutes. She texted her son to voice her disapproval, despite never having raised concerns before. The whole thing shook OP’s confidence.
Thankfully, her husband stood by her, calling her an excellent mother and shutting down his mom’s criticism. Still, the harsh comment stung. OP has since turned to a community of netizens to ask if she’s wrong for needing that half hour of pain relief while ensuring her child is safe, secure, and entertained.
From what OP tells us in her post, her mother-in-law seems quite toxic. So, unless she wants her husband to defend her every time something comes up, how can she deal with her difficult mom-in-law? We went looking for answers.
Image credits: Jack Sparrow / Pexels (not the actual photo)
In her article for Choosing Therapy, Tricia Johnson writes that a toxic mother-in-law can have a powerful impact on relationships, using manipulation tactics and subtle control that may go unnoticed by others, especially their own child.
According to Johnson, these behaviors can create tension and lead to issues like low self-esteem, anxiety, and even depression. Signs of a toxic mother-in-law include her disrespecting your boundaries, thinking she’s always right, passive aggression, emotional abuse, and gaslighting.
Johnson suggests a few ways to cope with a toxic mother-in-law, including communicating openly with your partner, setting realistic expectations and boundaries, practicing self-care and self-compassion, and not falling for the victim card.
In an article on the MomWell website, the authors write that boundary setting is self-care. It’s a declaration that you’re important; that you value yourself and your needs. Setting boundaries with in-laws isn’t disrespectful. It’s crucial for our well-being – and it’s also part of having a healthy relationship in the long run.
Maybe it’s time OP had a face-to-face, one-on-one, chat with her nosey mother-in-law. Who knows – maybe she’ll be able to rope her into some babysitting duty while she’s at it. One way or another, she definitely needs to defend her self-care.
Image credits: Yan Krukau / Pexels (not the actual photo)
Bored Panda reached out to psychologist Dr. Tirrell De Gannes of the Thriving Center of Psychology to get his take on OP’s situation. We asked Dr. De Gannes what kind of long-term emotional impact unsolicited criticism from a mother-in-law can have on a pregnant woman’s sense of self-worth and parenting confidence—especially when she’s already physically vulnerable.
He had this to say, “Depending on the relationship with the mother-in-law, unsolicited criticism can lead to any number or combination of negative consequences emotionally. Common reactions are resentment towards the mother-in-law, a decreased sense of trust and vulnerability with her or other women, perpetual feelings of anger, increased feelings of anxiety, and depressive feelings,”
De Gannes went on to add, “Not to mention, the pregnant woman’s sense of self-worth, particularly as a mother with another child on the way can plummet. Add to this equation the physical limitations and the impact on the body that comes with having multiple children, the pregnant mother can feel a sense of hopelessness that is difficult to break from if she takes the mother-in-law’s criticisms to heart.”
What would you do if you found yourself in OP’s shoes? Do you think she’s entitled to some periodic pain relief, or does her mother-in-law have a point? Let us know your opinion in the comments!
In the comments, readers agreed the original poster’s mom should be offering to help out rather than telling tales and told her she wasn’t being unreasonable at all
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
OP's behavior aside, I'm stunned by the commenter who suggested setting the kid up with an Ipad & toys in the bathroom. Toys, yes. In the bathroom, yup, seems reasonable. But an Ipad for a two-year-old? Completely unnecessary. I know it's considered acceptable & even OK for kids that age to have up to an hour of supervised screen time, but I'm an Old Fuddy Duddy™ and think that Duplos or some Playskool toys are far more appropriate.
I dont know why you were downvoted? Tablets are not good for children, especially those under 5, even moreso those under 3 years. Paediatricians say its not healthy. Plus, an electronic device, with a toddler, next to a bath of water - that tablet won't last long lol!
Load More Replies...So much of this depends on the child. I have three kids. At age two one of them could trusted to quietly, independently play with toys for 30 minutes. One would have scaled all the furniture, picked all the locks, vandalized the whole house and eaten at least 2 things he shouldn't have if I'd let him be out of sight for 30 minutes, he could cause chaos in 2 minutes. The third simply wouldn't have left me alone and would almost certainly have climbed in the bath with me.
I hate when people give the age of their child in months, but here I do think it makes a difference. 2 years of 24 months vs 35 months are really different in this case. I don't think it's neglect, but considering the speed that a heavily pregnant woman with sciatica can notice suspicious silence, call to the child, fail to get an answer, and then get out of a bathtub and help a choking child? Because death is often in under 4 minutes, and serious injury doesn't take that long. I do think it would be better to keep the daughter in the bathroom or within sight. If it is just 30 minutes she can play/read/watch a tablet with eyes on her. It's just better practice to keep them sighted when they are 2. Closer to 3, that's nursery age, I would still keep them in sight but you have a better argument.
OP's behavior aside, I'm stunned by the commenter who suggested setting the kid up with an Ipad & toys in the bathroom. Toys, yes. In the bathroom, yup, seems reasonable. But an Ipad for a two-year-old? Completely unnecessary. I know it's considered acceptable & even OK for kids that age to have up to an hour of supervised screen time, but I'm an Old Fuddy Duddy™ and think that Duplos or some Playskool toys are far more appropriate.
I dont know why you were downvoted? Tablets are not good for children, especially those under 5, even moreso those under 3 years. Paediatricians say its not healthy. Plus, an electronic device, with a toddler, next to a bath of water - that tablet won't last long lol!
Load More Replies...So much of this depends on the child. I have three kids. At age two one of them could trusted to quietly, independently play with toys for 30 minutes. One would have scaled all the furniture, picked all the locks, vandalized the whole house and eaten at least 2 things he shouldn't have if I'd let him be out of sight for 30 minutes, he could cause chaos in 2 minutes. The third simply wouldn't have left me alone and would almost certainly have climbed in the bath with me.
I hate when people give the age of their child in months, but here I do think it makes a difference. 2 years of 24 months vs 35 months are really different in this case. I don't think it's neglect, but considering the speed that a heavily pregnant woman with sciatica can notice suspicious silence, call to the child, fail to get an answer, and then get out of a bathtub and help a choking child? Because death is often in under 4 minutes, and serious injury doesn't take that long. I do think it would be better to keep the daughter in the bathroom or within sight. If it is just 30 minutes she can play/read/watch a tablet with eyes on her. It's just better practice to keep them sighted when they are 2. Closer to 3, that's nursery age, I would still keep them in sight but you have a better argument.
43
14